3 ms·
>An IP address was never supposed to be personally identifiable info. Says who? an IP is absolutely PII from its inception. It's an identifier. "IP X is reques
by devwastaken 3y ago
>An IP address was never supposed to be personally identifiable info.
Says who? an IP is absolutely PII from its inception. It's an identifier. "IP X is requesting xxxsite.com? That's assigned to Larry in accounting. Better call HR."
>internet will forever be under the control of a few large corps running data centers.
It alway was, is, and forever will be. Someone has to host things, this only works at scale.
>The real solution here is to completely disconnect an IP address from a person or physical location
This is called a VPN. or as I like to call it, an IP tumbler. When the major super powers no longer need it for espionage the current loopholes will be closed. The net became popular, it is by nature easy to abuse, therefore people will regulate it until it is "safe", of course it will only look that way.
- fluoridation 3y ago>Says who? an IP is absolutely PII from its inception. It's an identifier. "IP X is requesting xxxsite.com? That's assigned to Larry in accounting. Better call HR." No, it's locally identifiable information. IP X is assigned to Larry's computer. That might be Larry making that request, but it should be considered a leap in logic to reach that conclusion without more information.
- dragonwriter 3y agoIdentifiers assigned to objects associated with people, even indirectly, are PII even if it is possible for them to be misleading. PII doesn't require that the information be incapable of being misleading, otherwise almost nothing would be PII.