I don't dispute the calculus there, but that's not quite what I read in the passage from the article. In this case it's the consumer that's made to look ridicu

I don't dispute the calculus there, but that's not quite what I read in the passage from the article. In this case it's the consumer that's made to look ridiculous:- You can buy the car and get wrapped around a tree. But if the courts don't think Musk should pay you damages for that, then somehow you're more likely to buy the car.