I think you are misinterpreting it. The entire point of the book is that innovators at one point need to disrupt their own innovation at a later point or be dis

I think you are misinterpreting it. The entire point of the book is that innovators at one point need to disrupt their own innovation at a later point or be disrupted by others. I.e. they cannot rest on their laurels forever. So they clear did do something wrong and didn’t make the right decision. Google is the epitome of a company that rested on its laurels, became the very evil they ostensibly didn’t want to become, forgot how to innovate, and treated their customers with hostility. Good riddance.