3 ms·
> the government didn't really want to arrest all the people, cause that would indicate they are not in control Objectively, not arresting them indicates they
by asu_thomas 3y ago
> the government didn't really want to arrest all the people, cause that would indicate they are not in control
Objectively, not arresting them indicates they are not in control more than arresting them would.
- barkingcat 3y agoof course, but the central government is all about seeming to be in control, not objectively in control. mass arrest -> leads to questions about why 1000's of young couples are being arrested due to them not wanting to pay mortgages on houses they can't move into for years, and has no construction progress (the construction is abandoned), and this is a contagion that will lead to another city starting to rebel, leading to more mass arrests. Not talking about 1 or 2 people, but thousands. vs. the central government is taking care of the people by forcing a company into bankruptcy so they can't take advantage of people anymore. The 2nd is the better narrative. That's what they picked. Doesn't make sense, but is what happened.
- licebmi__at__ 3y agoI know that this comment will seem as pro china, but really your comment is really weird and almost funny. The way you portray the two perspectives sounds like a good Chinese government action being spun like a bad thing because actually "China bad".
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]