3 ms·
IMO (and I'm not a materials engineer) my first thought was the car got ramped off a railroad track or something and landed hard, which basically took any stres
by flutas 3y ago
IMO (and I'm not a materials engineer) my first thought was the car got ramped off a railroad track or something and landed hard, which basically took any stress in the materials that were already there and caused them to essentially "bubble up" in the form of visible cracking.
Something like that most likely wouldn't be logged as a collision, but I think there would be other signs of that... Of course we're basically getting the best angle of one side of the story and none from the other side in the article.
- ImPostingOnHN 3y agomy first thought was that a company infamous for cutting corners on quality, run by an internet troll infamous for trying to avoid responsibility for his actions, violating regulations, and shunning safety, both decided to do what they were infamous for something like that seems way more likely than the sort of coverup you're suggesting, especially since elmu, not Cracked_Tesla, is the one here who is infamous for coverups
- dragonwriter 3y ago> Of course we're basically getting the best angle of one side of the story and none from the other side in the article. Well, we can understand why we don’t have more of Tesla’s side of the story since what we do have is their written instructions not to put any technical feedback in writing.
- Symbiote 3y agoIf Tesla or their agents drop the car while delivering it, it's still their problem to fix it or take it back.