4 ms·
> NetBSD 5.1 was great. Arguably one of the best releases in the project's history. What would make it one of the best in your opinion? I used to like 1.6 and
by rahen 3y ago
> NetBSD 5.1 was great. Arguably one of the best releases in the project's history.
What would make it one of the best in your opinion?
I used to like 1.6 and 2.0 a lot, personally.
- 1vuio0pswjnm7 3y agoIs it even possible to download the 1.6 source these days. Everything was moved to archive.netbsd.org, not FTP access and all I can get from https://archive.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD-archive/NetBSD-1.6/source/sets/ https://archive.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD-archive/NetBSD-1.6/sou... is this error <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html> <head> <title>503 Backend unavailable, connection timeout</title> </head> <body> <h1>Error 503 Backend unavailable, connection timeout</h1> <p>Backend unavailable, connection timeout</p> <h3>Error 54113</h3> <p>Details: cache-[redacted]</p> <hr> <p>Varnish cache server</p> </body> </html> closed