3 ms·

I confess to making the mistake many times of thinking that I was capturing a value when I was capturing a variable, but the author has me confused and concerne

I confess to making the mistake many times of thinking that I was capturing a value when I was capturing a variable, but the author has me confused and concerned that the semantics of lambdas have been changed such that a lambda always captures the value and not the variable. Capturing variables is darn useful and more general than capturing values. It would be totally unlike MS to break all of my code as much as I wish they would in other cases, so I'm going to assume that they've done something more clever than that.

galactus 15y ago
Exactly, I also find it a bit confusing. I assume they are capturing variables (it would be crazy otherwise!) but they treat loop variables differently (as if a new variable was created every time).
- noblethrasher 15y ago
  Yes, they are now creating a new variable in the `foreach` loop each time. They aren't doing the same for regular `for` loops so their behavior with respect to lambdas won't change.
  - TheNinjaneer 15y ago
    To add to this, Eric Lippert, a principal dev on the C# compiler team, mentions this in a StackOverflow response (http://stackoverflow.com/a/8899347/59111 http://stackoverflow.com/a/8899347/59111). He also blogged about the issue in general in a two part series, the first of which can be read here: Closing over the loop variable considered harmful (http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ericlippert/archive/2009/11/12/closing-over-the-loop-variable-considered-harmful.aspx http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ericlippert/archive/2009/11/12/closi...).
achy 15y ago
They haven't actually changes the lambda code at all, they have only changed the fact that previously the foreach variable was declared outside the loop, now it is declared inside the scope. The lambda still closes over the loop variable. If you code your own loop, feel free to declare the loop entities anywhere you like.

galactus 15y ago

Exactly, I also find it a bit confusing. I assume they are capturing variables (it would be crazy otherwise!) but they treat loop variables differently (as if a new variable was created every time).

noblethrasher 15y ago
Yes, they are now creating a new variable in the `foreach` loop each time. They aren't doing the same for regular `for` loops so their behavior with respect to lambdas won't change.
- TheNinjaneer 15y ago
  To add to this, Eric Lippert, a principal dev on the C# compiler team, mentions this in a StackOverflow response (http://stackoverflow.com/a/8899347/59111 http://stackoverflow.com/a/8899347/59111). He also blogged about the issue in general in a two part series, the first of which can be read here: Closing over the loop variable considered harmful (http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ericlippert/archive/2009/11/12/closing-over-the-loop-variable-considered-harmful.aspx http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ericlippert/archive/2009/11/12/closi...).

achy 15y ago

They haven't actually changes the lambda code at all, they have only changed the fact that previously the foreach variable was declared outside the loop, now it is declared inside the scope. The lambda still closes over the loop variable. If you code your own loop, feel free to declare the loop entities anywhere you like.