"Hey do you know what exponential growth is?" You think I just say that sentence and suddenly all your arguments are suddenly flushed down the toilet because I

"Hey do you know what exponential growth is?" You think I just say that sentence and suddenly all your arguments are suddenly flushed down the toilet because I stated some random concept out of nowhere? Come on. You need evidence. You brought up this question of diminishing returns out of nowhere and offer no evidence for it. So why would my point not stand? I read the sibling comments. One person brought it up but offered no proof that this is what's happening. Simply did what you did in a manner that was less rude, just stated the concept of diminishing returns applies to LLMs without offering a shred of evidence that indicates this is what is happening. There is a difference between introducing the concept of diminishing returns out of nowhere, and providing evidence that diminishing returns is WHAT is actually HAPPENING with LLMS. We're about a year out from the introduction of chatgpt, that's not enough time to know if all the gains in the past decade of AI has suddenly hit wall of diminishing returns.