My experience with scrum is: metric driven development. Not metric as in the measure of the effect of your code, but Jira (or whatever your task manager is) me

My experience with scrum is: metric driven development. Not metric as in the measure of the effect of your code, but Jira (or whatever your task manager is) metrics. It systematize the process, without taking the actual work into consideration. This is why you get a "but you did the other similar project with just 50 points." The metrics always win because developers end up working overnight to complete the project on time. So it validates the metrics. My teammates message me when they find issues with their task. We discuss, hop on calls, involve other teammates, the works. But then on the daily stand up, we repeat the issue to the scrum master, even though this person could care less about the issue. Scrum is a fantastic tool if your job involves making reports about the work being done. Except, it doesn't reflect the actual work being done. And my poor reader, you are probably not in a position where you can do something about it.