> someone has to go out of their way to interfere with them. How is this thing with the traffic cones not "going out of their way to interfere"? > the dividin

> someone has to go out of their way to interfere with them. How is this thing with the traffic cones not "going out of their way to interfere"? > the dividing line for what constitutes "messing with" them is not clear at all. If you're deliberately jamming up traffic by any means, it's perfectly clear which side of the line you're on.