Removing the OP energy of "enrage to engage", I think there's a room for a more nuanced position. It's a pity that we do not have more people doing systematic

Removing the OP energy of "enrage to engage", I think there's a room for a more nuanced position. It's a pity that we do not have more people doing systematic research related with Scrum/Agile practices and it's advantages, Regarding on outcomes, in comparison with RUP, empirically we know that it worked better based on economic results + adoption/spread + people empathetic to use it in a corporate environment. However, after 22 years of Agile/Scrum we do not know in a systematic and in a scientific researched way the second order (side effects) of Scrum as a management tool, and which kinds of incentives it creates. We know empirically based in a small amount samples.