3 ms·
Throwing out dubious security advice, especially as a lemma for downplaying legitimate concerns, requires backing it up with details. If you don't want to have
by mindslight 3y ago
Throwing out dubious security advice, especially as a lemma for downplaying legitimate concerns, requires backing it up with details. If you don't want to have tedious discussions, the sooner you supply those details the better. FWIW you were the one who said you were going to stop replying, but apparently you care just enough to dig your heels in on the content-free part of your argument, but not enough to actually fill any details of what you're trying to advocate.
- PrimeMcFly 3y agoI haven't thrown out any dubious security advice. I made a point which seems to have gone over your head, and that you've turned into both a strawman and discussion of semantics. Absurd. And you don't get to dictate the terms of any discussion. All your comment is showing here is that you need to have the last word and want to argue for the sake of arguing. So have at it. You're no longer worth my time.
- mindslight 3y agoAnd this point that went over my head was? Don't confuse understanding with disagreement. I started off curious what you might be referring to, if it wasn't just work profiles. I still am. But now I'm mostly just amazed how set you are in arguing some abstract unsubstantiated point, when a simple link could have supported it long ago. (Also for reference, if someone said "I've read about Covid from a reputable source", what would you think?)