3 ms·
There was a good video posted here yesterday about a (for me) seemingly typical experience writing code with chatGPT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2Q3KAOSAEY
by version_five 3y ago
There was a good video posted here yesterday about a (for me) seemingly typical experience writing code with chatGPT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2Q3KAOSAEY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2Q3KAOSAEY
The combination of hallucination and just bad advice makes it time consuming and not clearly worth it. I think it's a step in the right direction for conversational interfaces. The fact that you really can have a back and forth to clarify intent, make corrections, and arrive at a "meeting of the minds" is lightyears beyond "intent recognition" type chat, and what a conversation should be. It just needs more work, which may or may not be straightforward.
- Lerc 3y agoHaving the ChatGPT 4 icon being purple has been a godsend when evaluating claims like these.
- version_five 3y agoInteresting, I never noticed but I guess you're saying he used 3.5? I've only used 4, which I understand is way better, and I've still had the same kind of problems, but I agree it's disingenuous to equate 3.5 with the current state of the technology.