3 ms·

A reply to your points (each numbered respectively). 1. Porn is already free and available. So I’m not sure why you assume it isn’t. I’m sure the men can acqui

by demarq 3y ago

A reply to your points (each numbered respectively). 1. Porn is already free and available. So I’m not sure why you assume it isn’t. I’m sure the men can acquire it themselves. 2. Exchanging sex for physical protection, is still having to have sex just to be on the base. It’s just easier all round to remove men on the base that can’t control themselves, than invent an extraordinary sex protection fighting system. 3. hiring an extra team of people for the purpose of sexually satisfying the men, sounds like added and complexity and cost. Again it seems the solution is to remove men who are incapable of doing science things without groping and pinning fellow colleagues to the wall. 4. I actually support your 4th idea. more women definitely equalises the influence over the culture at the base, especially if it includes the leadership. Perhaps the first step to achieve that ratio is to remove the men that can’t control themselves. You have a great reason to kick them off the base, kind of works out really. I’d like to suggest a number 5 solution. since it’s a place of science and experimentation we should see what happens if we remove all the men who are accused of SH and SA. What would be the changes we would see?

corethree 3y ago
1. It is. It would be a lot worse if it wasn't available. More of it will help. 2. I don't think you understand human nature. Inventing sex for protection isn't a thing that I made up it's one of the foundational institutions of marriage and monogamous relationships throughout human civilization. You think a man will engage in a sexless relationship with a woman and offer her all the benefits of a relationship with no sex in return? No. The woman's best strategy is to pair up with a man and get protection if that's what she wants. Sex is part of the transaction. Woman have been doing this for eons what I suggest here is no different. Additionally you can't just remove men who have no control over their sexual urges. First off men hide the amount of control they have, so you won't know. Second off almost all men eventually take the risk if they're deprived long enough. 3. Like I said. Non ideal solution. But this works. And it has worked to pacify urges in places where there's a large amount of men. 4. And like I said the problem here is women don't want to go to Antarctica. It's men who are more willing to take the risk and go. Women tend to value more balanced choices while men are willing to go to extremes to satisfy particular objectives. So if you enforce this you'll restrict the population by a huge amount. Not to mention this is sexist gender policy designed to favor women. 5. You can't. Large numbers of men engage in this behavior. Most of it is harmless and of the nature of catcalling. You remove these men you'll remove over half the population. Also you can't prove these men did it. Second it's only a matter of time. All men have sexual urges and all of this becomes stronger the more they are deprived.. You seem to think that the population of men can be divided into two. Good men and bad men. Bro. Its more complicated then that. It's a gradient and different situations and circumstances can cause any man to shift on that gradient. Also most of the men tough enough to go to Antarctica aren't exactly the types that are submissive.

by demarq 3y ago

corethree 3y ago

1. It is. It would be a lot worse if it wasn't available. More of it will help. 2. I don't think you understand human nature. Inventing sex for protection isn't a thing that I made up it's one of the foundational institutions of marriage and monogamous relationships throughout human civilization. You think a man will engage in a sexless relationship with a woman and offer her all the benefits of a relationship with no sex in return? No. The woman's best strategy is to pair up with a man and get protection if that's what she wants. Sex is part of the transaction. Woman have been doing this for eons what I suggest here is no different. Additionally you can't just remove men who have no control over their sexual urges. First off men hide the amount of control they have, so you won't know. Second off almost all men eventually take the risk if they're deprived long enough. 3. Like I said. Non ideal solution. But this works. And it has worked to pacify urges in places where there's a large amount of men. 4. And like I said the problem here is women don't want to go to Antarctica. It's men who are more willing to take the risk and go. Women tend to value more balanced choices while men are willing to go to extremes to satisfy particular objectives. So if you enforce this you'll restrict the population by a huge amount. Not to mention this is sexist gender policy designed to favor women. 5. You can't. Large numbers of men engage in this behavior. Most of it is harmless and of the nature of catcalling. You remove these men you'll remove over half the population. Also you can't prove these men did it. Second it's only a matter of time. All men have sexual urges and all of this becomes stronger the more they are deprived.. You seem to think that the population of men can be divided into two. Good men and bad men. Bro. Its more complicated then that. It's a gradient and different situations and circumstances can cause any man to shift on that gradient. Also most of the men tough enough to go to Antarctica aren't exactly the types that are submissive.