8 ms·

From an earlier post, copying my answer which seems relevant to your query > Being a Japanese resident (PR) now, I did look up this option for a summer home in

From an earlier post, copying my answer which seems relevant to your query > Being a Japanese resident (PR) now, I did look up this option for a summer home in the woods (Akita, Aichi-ken etc). This is what I learnt: * Akiya houses come with an agreement to reside. Not just be a summer home. Their goal is to repopulate the countryside. * You have to cultivate any farmland that comes with the deed. You cannot sell it without special permission. There is a whole lot of paperwork to deal with such situations. * Most old Akiya will have strong regulation not to change the frontage significantly. It isn't permitted. Architecturally these changes have to be consistent with the older house and rest of the community. Building permits are very stringent. (Basically, you can't build a sprawling European villa in a Japanese countryside for e.g., even if land wasn't a concern.) * Land tax is levied the day from purchase - not from the day of moving in. (This could pinch given that time to renovate can be 1-2 years in remote places, and taxes aren't cheap necessarily) * Residents have to contribute to local development funds which take care of Matsuris etc. You like it or not, local government will knock on your door with a bill. * Connectivity is poor. Cell reception outside NTT can be spotty. Internet is even harder. * Language proficiency is a must. No one speaks English. Not even the local government officials. * House will need a significant amount of renovation. With the stringent restrictions - anywhere between 100 & 200 grand (depending on the disrepair)

crooked-v 3y ago
That seems like a very "wanting to have your cake and eat it too" setup on the part of the local municipalities. 'No summer homes' seems like an easy way for many of them to get no people at all, especially since the country as a whole has very good housing policy and so doesn't have the same kind of home affordability crisis as the US.
- renewiltord 3y ago
  It looks like their order of preferences is: Repopulate by old standards > take the L > become vacation community I don't think it's "wanting to have your cake and eat it too" so much as it being the same as sometimes I want something done but not if it costs too much. In that case, having it not done is better than paying too much for it.
- Ekaros 3y ago
  Vacation homes might bring occasional injection of cash, but they do not really support local community and local services for most of the year. So it is understandable that unless community is build on that type of industry they do not want it and instead focus on those that bring more revenue.
  - jrockway 3y ago
    I mean, you pay property tax whether you live there or not. I don't know how this works in other states or other countries, but at least in New York a primary residence has tax advantages. That said, I'm not sure what you do with a rich municipality that has no residents. You probably want the corner store to be open when you go out there for the winter for some reason, and with no customers, that's not an economic reality.
    - polski-g 3y ago
      "Paying property tax" does not fund the local business revenue needs.
      - jrockway 3y ago
        Tax dollars can be used for pretty much anything. "We'll write you a check every month if you keep your store open," for example. I think infrastructure needs to come before people will come. "Induced demand" basically.
        fomine3 3y ago
        tax valuation is almost zero.
        throwaway2037 3y ago
        This is not correct. The house is worth zero, but the land has value. This will generate tax revenue.
- gloryjulio 3y ago
  Not really. Their goal is for the local community first and foremost. You know what you are getting into if you trying to buy this kind property.
  - crooked-v 3y ago
    My point is that for a lot of these places, unless they can figure out some way to be more appealing, there will be no local community before all that long.
    - gloryjulio 3y ago
      Japan is in population decline and people are moving to the city. There is no reversal of this trend. Compromise would not solve the problem anyway. Making sure the the current crops of the residents are part of the local community is a good goal. They are not gonna win, might as well preserve what they have temporarily.
      - ekianjo 3y ago
        > They are not gonna win, might as well preserve what they have temporarily So they are betting on slow death. Thats a hell of a plan
        gloryjulio 3y ago
        How is selling vocation homes to the outsiders who refuses to comply with local communities not a slow death anyway? You conveniently ignored the bigger picture that so many ppl mentioned: ppl are moving to the cities. If the local economy is gonna gonna die, might as well die gracefully
        ekianjo 3y ago
        Thats just an excuse not to try to do anything. If you have more tax money you have more options than zero. > refusing to comply You are always free to change the stupid rules
- Unfrozen0688 3y ago
  No? Its their land? YOU just want an ez cheap house.
- makeitdouble 3y ago
  Welp, those are empty houses for a reason. Home affordability is stil an issue, people working in the metro area while being homeless is a thing, but they still probably end up better than being jobless in the emptying and infra less countryside.
- phantomathkg 3y ago
  You see this from a foreign, money-centric view, which may work for some locals in US maybe? For many Japanese local government, what they want is for the outsider, that includes people from other parts of the Japan, to come, and blend in to the community.
caesil 3y ago
>* Most old Akiya will have strong regulation not to change the frontage. It isn't permitted. Architecturally these have to be consistent. Building permits are very stringent. Interesting how at odds this is with land use rules in Tokyo.
- makeitdouble 3y ago
  I think it's mostly due to these specific localities. Countryside with no specific preservation rules and more favorable arrangements are plenty. They will have better chance to see new people moving in, or have better land reuse policies, leaving few empty homes in the first place.
bigbillheck 3y ago
> Land tax is levied the day from purchase - not from the day of moving in. Every time I've bought a house in the US it worked the same way.
ekianjo 3y ago
> Akiya houses come with an agreement to reside. Not just be a summer home. Their goal is to repopulate the countryside Such villages will be long dead before it happens. There is no point living there all year round.
throw0101b 3y ago
> You have to cultivate any farmland that comes with the deed. You cannot sell it without special permission. There is a whole lot of paperwork to deal with such situations. In the book How Asia Works, Studwell argues that the small-plot farms that the government of Japan seems to 'encourage' don't make sense and are a hinderance: * https://www.gatesnotes.com/How-Asia-Works https://www.gatesnotes.com/How-Asia-Works They were fine initially as developing countries have an 'excess' of labour, and small farms need more workers, but once industrialization starts, labour is better used in factories and other high value chain parts of the economy, and it's better to mechanize/automate larger farms. Japan did move up the value chain, but farm-plot consolidation didn't really happen, so a large portion of farms are run by an aging population.

crooked-v 3y ago

That seems like a very "wanting to have your cake and eat it too" setup on the part of the local municipalities. 'No summer homes' seems like an easy way for many of them to get no people at all, especially since the country as a whole has very good housing policy and so doesn't have the same kind of home affordability crisis as the US.

renewiltord 3y ago
It looks like their order of preferences is: Repopulate by old standards > take the L > become vacation community I don't think it's "wanting to have your cake and eat it too" so much as it being the same as sometimes I want something done but not if it costs too much. In that case, having it not done is better than paying too much for it.
Ekaros 3y ago
Vacation homes might bring occasional injection of cash, but they do not really support local community and local services for most of the year. So it is understandable that unless community is build on that type of industry they do not want it and instead focus on those that bring more revenue.
- jrockway 3y ago
  I mean, you pay property tax whether you live there or not. I don't know how this works in other states or other countries, but at least in New York a primary residence has tax advantages. That said, I'm not sure what you do with a rich municipality that has no residents. You probably want the corner store to be open when you go out there for the winter for some reason, and with no customers, that's not an economic reality.
  - polski-g 3y ago
    "Paying property tax" does not fund the local business revenue needs.
    - jrockway 3y ago
      Tax dollars can be used for pretty much anything. "We'll write you a check every month if you keep your store open," for example. I think infrastructure needs to come before people will come. "Induced demand" basically.
      - fomine3 3y ago
        tax valuation is almost zero.
        throwaway2037 3y ago
        This is not correct. The house is worth zero, but the land has value. This will generate tax revenue.
gloryjulio 3y ago
Not really. Their goal is for the local community first and foremost. You know what you are getting into if you trying to buy this kind property.
- crooked-v 3y ago
  My point is that for a lot of these places, unless they can figure out some way to be more appealing, there will be no local community before all that long.
  - gloryjulio 3y ago
    Japan is in population decline and people are moving to the city. There is no reversal of this trend. Compromise would not solve the problem anyway. Making sure the the current crops of the residents are part of the local community is a good goal. They are not gonna win, might as well preserve what they have temporarily.
    - ekianjo 3y ago
      > They are not gonna win, might as well preserve what they have temporarily So they are betting on slow death. Thats a hell of a plan
      - gloryjulio 3y ago
        How is selling vocation homes to the outsiders who refuses to comply with local communities not a slow death anyway? You conveniently ignored the bigger picture that so many ppl mentioned: ppl are moving to the cities. If the local economy is gonna gonna die, might as well die gracefully
        ekianjo 3y ago
        Thats just an excuse not to try to do anything. If you have more tax money you have more options than zero. > refusing to comply You are always free to change the stupid rules
Unfrozen0688 3y ago
No? Its their land? YOU just want an ez cheap house.
makeitdouble 3y ago
Welp, those are empty houses for a reason. Home affordability is stil an issue, people working in the metro area while being homeless is a thing, but they still probably end up better than being jobless in the emptying and infra less countryside.
phantomathkg 3y ago
You see this from a foreign, money-centric view, which may work for some locals in US maybe? For many Japanese local government, what they want is for the outsider, that includes people from other parts of the Japan, to come, and blend in to the community.

caesil 3y ago

>* Most old Akiya will have strong regulation not to change the frontage. It isn't permitted. Architecturally these have to be consistent. Building permits are very stringent. Interesting how at odds this is with land use rules in Tokyo.

makeitdouble 3y ago
I think it's mostly due to these specific localities. Countryside with no specific preservation rules and more favorable arrangements are plenty. They will have better chance to see new people moving in, or have better land reuse policies, leaving few empty homes in the first place.

bigbillheck 3y ago

> Land tax is levied the day from purchase - not from the day of moving in. Every time I've bought a house in the US it worked the same way.

ekianjo 3y ago

> Akiya houses come with an agreement to reside. Not just be a summer home. Their goal is to repopulate the countryside Such villages will be long dead before it happens. There is no point living there all year round.

throw0101b 3y ago

> You have to cultivate any farmland that comes with the deed. You cannot sell it without special permission. There is a whole lot of paperwork to deal with such situations. In the book How Asia Works, Studwell argues that the small-plot farms that the government of Japan seems to 'encourage' don't make sense and are a hinderance: * https://www.gatesnotes.com/How-Asia-Works https://www.gatesnotes.com/How-Asia-Works They were fine initially as developing countries have an 'excess' of labour, and small farms need more workers, but once industrialization starts, labour is better used in factories and other high value chain parts of the economy, and it's better to mechanize/automate larger farms. Japan did move up the value chain, but farm-plot consolidation didn't really happen, so a large portion of farms are run by an aging population.