4 ms·
A lot of this traffic is point-to-point, meaning that if you're not in the line of sight, you'd never see the data. So as long as nobody puts up a pirate radio
by SkipperCat 3y ago
A lot of this traffic is point-to-point, meaning that if you're not in the line of sight, you'd never see the data. So as long as nobody puts up a pirate radio tower, there's not much need for encryption.
- klez 3y ago> So as long as nobody puts up a pirate radio tower, there's not much need for encryption. Maybe I'm over-extrapolating here, but isn't this the same kind of reasoning that gave us MITM-attacks in clear-text http?
- SkipperCat 3y agoI think the difference is that its not very hard to plug a computer into a switch and sniff network traffic. But it is extremely hard to stand up a 300' tower in the middle of a corn field and MITM microwave signals. The chance of anyone pulling that off before being busted is all but nil.
- BenjiWiebe 3y agoPoint to point at HF frequencies doesn't really exist. The wavelengths are huge and directionality is poor. I mean, you can set up point to point communications, but people quite a distance away will be able to make it point to multi-point.