3 ms·
I wrote this in a recent article [1]: Today, if a wealthy benefactor wanted to emulate a Renaissance patron and fund an architect or artist to create a new tow
by keiferski 3y ago
I wrote this in a recent article [1]:
Today, if a wealthy benefactor wanted to emulate a Renaissance patron and fund an architect or artist to create a new town square or city park, it’s unclear how he or she would even go about doing so. There don’t appear to be any financial instruments specifically designed for rewarding investors that fund integrated artworks. The design of the public space would almost certainly be watered down and subject to various governmental councils and community groups. Hostile attitudes toward the wealthy would probably result in the park being vandalized, if it were actually built.
The hostility toward ideas like this new city is a major reason why we don’t have Renaissance-quality architecture anymore. Some of the most beautiful cities in the world were funded by the past equivalent of billionaires.
Today, there is too much resentment and tall poppy syndrome and any attempts to use private funds toward architectural projects is immediately criticized as being a bad thing.
1. https://onthearts.com/p/modern-culture-is-too-escapist-part https://onthearts.com/p/modern-culture-is-too-escapist-part
- masfuerte 3y agoEh? My city has many beautiful parks that were private estates. They were simply given to the city by their wealthy owners. Rich people can do this now if they want to.
- washadjeffmad 3y agohttps://faculty.mercer.edu/davis_da/fys102/baconsfield.html https://faculty.mercer.edu/davis_da/fys102/baconsfield.html Many properties are not "given", but managed in trust. As in the above example, while Baconsfield Park lasted for over half a century, control was reverted (wrongly) to the heirs, and the land was sold off.
- masfuerte 3y agoThat's the point. Rich people are free to make generous benefactions but they'd rather retain control and when that's impossible they whinge that society is limiting their generosity.
- keiferski 3y agoThat is just charity, not investment. Renaissance artworks weren't funded as a charity.
- masfuerte 3y agoNor as an investment.