3 ms·
This freaks me out. Even if it's not that good now, it looks like it's only going to get better and essentially either force programmers out of a job or force p
by matteoraso 3y ago
This freaks me out. Even if it's not that good now, it looks like it's only going to get better and essentially either force programmers out of a job or force programmers to adopt non-free software to do their jobs. Grim.
- adocomplete 3y agoI personally don't see it that way. I see it as a tool to help us be more productive as programmers. So much of my day to day when writing code is getting context, looking up best practices, and then writing code. With Cody I can get up to speed much faster and be more productive as a developer, giving me more time to do the things I want to do.
- gloosx 3y agoThink about it this way – it will get better for turning natural language into code, but natural language will never get better than code for the job of theory-building behind a full-fledged application. Just because it's higher-level semantics are not as good for the business logic as code itself. Natural language is genetically bound with emotion and sentiment. It is inconsistent in the wildest ways and the words can have myriads of meanings. The best code craftsmen "think" code straight away, without the natural language shenanigans around it.