Perhaps he is opposed to political solutions and top-down control of society implied by belief in climate change(justifying it "for the good of the planet") pr

Perhaps he is opposed to political solutions and top-down control of society implied by belief in climate change(justifying it "for the good of the planet") proposed by jet-setting elite who will never change their lifestyle: a hypocritical class of "climate priests" pushing for extreme austerity and totalitarian control of the average man while their luxury lifestyles are exempt. The whole climate politics begins to feel like a cult with carbon indulgences, original sin of pollution, doomsday prophets and sermons,etc This of course is very beneficial for fossil fuel industry to turn climate research into "church of climatechangeology" in the eyes of public that will create huge opposition to any practical reform just because it feels like forced "doctrine from the experts" - regardless of actual value or truth. Climatechangeology and "Faith in Science" arguments will not receive "rational understanding" from the value of their accuracy as long as underlying political framework is built like a cult - they don't have the neutrality of fact-based science and neither moral power/conviction of religious doctrine. Having the entire media apparatus on your side will not make Climatechangeology more prestigious or believable, in fact it would make it seem more cultish and totalitarian even if its factual basis becomes undeniable. People don't like totalitarianism and implications of belief in climatechangeology is allowing totalitarian control as end-goal.