4 ms·

I've been remote for almost 7 years. I live ~175 miles to the closest tech hub, so changing to in-office work isn't an option unless I move. If I was forced t

I've been remote for almost 7 years. I live ~175 miles to the closest tech hub, so changing to in-office work isn't an option unless I move. If I was forced to move, an equivalent house to what I have now would cost about 3 times as much and I'd have at least an hour commute each way. I save a lot of money not commuting and eating at home, and a lot of issues I'd otherwise have to miss work for if I went into an office (family illness, childcare issues) are super easy to adjust my schedule to work around.

kmkemp 3y ago
Similar story here. I've been remote for 9 years. I don't live that far from a minor tech hub, but it would still be an hour commute each way. Housing here is below the national average, so there is a huge savings there. I've only put maybe 10k miles on my 2007 Corolla in the last 5 years, so I pay much less in gas/maintenance/replacing vehicles. I can have delicious, healthy food every day for half the cost. If I need someone to come to my house for repairs (or other reasons), I don't need to take a day off or miss hardly any work time. I don't have to be mad when they don't show up (maybe a little). My daughter can attend a great school that requires pickup, because being away from my PC for 30 minutes every day in the afternoon is just not a big deal. If I want to take a break and get in a quick jog in the middle of the day, it costs almost nothing in lost time; I just walk outside and start running. I don't know what sort of raise I would have to get to convince me to give all of that up. I think I've settled on 40%, which is untenable without relocation.
DrBazza 3y ago
In the UK, the move to WFH saved me £7000 per annum (the cost of a annual rail season ticket), the equivalent of £10,000 gross salary (taxed to £7k net).

4 ms·

I've been remote for almost 7 years. I live ~175 miles to the closest tech hub, so changing to in-office work isn't an option unless I move. If I was forced t

by pyjarrett 3y ago

kmkemp 3y ago
Similar story here. I've been remote for 9 years. I don't live that far from a minor tech hub, but it would still be an hour commute each way. Housing here is below the national average, so there is a huge savings there. I've only put maybe 10k miles on my 2007 Corolla in the last 5 years, so I pay much less in gas/maintenance/replacing vehicles. I can have delicious, healthy food every day for half the cost. If I need someone to come to my house for repairs (or other reasons), I don't need to take a day off or miss hardly any work time. I don't have to be mad when they don't show up (maybe a little). My daughter can attend a great school that requires pickup, because being away from my PC for 30 minutes every day in the afternoon is just not a big deal. If I want to take a break and get in a quick jog in the middle of the day, it costs almost nothing in lost time; I just walk outside and start running. I don't know what sort of raise I would have to get to convince me to give all of that up. I think I've settled on 40%, which is untenable without relocation.
DrBazza 3y ago
In the UK, the move to WFH saved me £7000 per annum (the cost of a annual rail season ticket), the equivalent of £10,000 gross salary (taxed to £7k net).