2 ms·

hello, in my experience, agile/scrum is great - in theory. in "the wild"/in practices its mostly implemented in a way, which "pleases lower & upper mgmt" but

hello, in my experience, agile/scrum is great - in theory. in "the wild"/in practices its mostly implemented in a way, which "pleases lower & upper mgmt" but doesn't take into account the features necessary for the team(s) to be able to work smoothly. so: not agile/scrum need to be revisited, but the implementation of agile processes / scrum in companies/projects etc... cheers, t. ps.: and lots of companies want to do "scrum" with far to few people / small projects - mostly situations, where imho. kanban with a backlog would be sufficient and especially more effective.

paperplaneflyr 3y ago
Aptly put. My question did miss context and was brief. Implementation of agile/scrum process does need some refining. You did mention the point of "pleases lower & upper mgmt" which translates into reports and metrics that things are moving forward. But the effectiveness of using a process by the actual people working matters. I feel it locks aways some amount of potential in the ceremonies/rituals which are given more importance.