4 ms·
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0aiEqINoa-I https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0aiEqINoa-I You now can create unrealistic standards via machine and earn hard cash
by survivorBias 3y ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0aiEqINoa-I https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0aiEqINoa-I
You now can create unrealistic standards via machine and earn hard cash doing so. Monetize all the things, everything has to go.
PS: Psychology is mostly studies on pschology students or other students, which prefilters the result pretty hard. So ever study is basically: "And how does the local well-off elite feel about that?"
- tinrab 3y agoWhy do people always complain about unrealistic standards? I can't see how that would be bad. The problem is repeated dopamine hits.
- Eddy_Viscosity2 3y agoIt's both.
- toofy 3y agoWhile dopamine hits almost certainly plays a role, We need to be more mindful of our uses of “The problem is…” when we’re discussing complex nuanced fractal-tier depth subjects. There will almost never be one (or The) problem. I know it’s semantic, but I think particular thing matters, even in casual discussions that don’t demand rigor. It’s lazy of us to delude ourselves that something like this is only one issue. Particularly when it’s used in response to tear down someone else’s hypothesis—this just needlessly stifles more conversation.
- wiseowise 3y agoWhen supply outweighs demand you don’t get much money. I would be really surprised if any of those generated influencer army get anything.