I think you're assuming magic where in fact there is considerable evidence of effort. I'm going to get a little reductionist here. What you said is no differen

I think you're assuming magic where in fact there is considerable evidence of effort. I'm going to get a little reductionist here. What you said is no different than arguing for creationism (not ironic, we are discussing creating ultimately). Just because Earth is a perfect planet, and we get to drive around in self driving cars, doesn't mean there is any evidence for a grand plan (or any effort of it). Talent and intuition is kind of like discussing recursion. To first understand recursion ... Tarantino is just a lucky talented shit, and there's no rhyme or reason for it. Any explanation he gives you after the fact, is just that, after the fact. And the rest of us trying to explain it is no different than trading derivatives. Tell me the study and rigor that went into the Big Kahuna Burger.