3 ms·
Doesn’t this just reflect that humans are generally just large language models? Maybe throw in an extra dimension of “emotions” that are useful for training?
by ttul 3y ago
Doesn’t this just reflect that humans are generally just large language models? Maybe throw in an extra dimension of “emotions” that are useful for training?
- swader999 3y agoThese llms are weak facsimiles of the brain, not humans. The real world is the ultimate training model, it can't be fully substituted with a bunch of strings.
- bloaf 3y agoThis sounds like the old question "if a blind-from-birth man (who can recognize squares by feel) gained sight would he be able to recognize squares visually?" And since that question has been answered in the negative, I'm inclined to agree.
- goatlover 3y agoNo, humans are living organisms. Talking is just one thing we do, and we do it for reasons other than to generate the next token.