3 ms·
"quelled"? how? If you think a story is bullshite, you should be free to say so. If you disagree, likewise. So many things that have been characterized as "org
by h2odragon 3y ago
"quelled"? how?
If you think a story is bullshite, you should be free to say so. If you disagree, likewise. So many things that have been characterized as "organized disinformation campaigns" over the last 3 years turned out to be individuals expressing opinions; the organization and the lies were on the other side of those conflicts.
Where do we put advertising in this? Does Red bull give you wings or cancer? Should someone be allowed to pay others to propagate a message stating one, but not the other?
(edited to try to increase clarity)
- consumer451 3y ago> If you think that's what it is, you should be free to say so. If you disagree, likewise. If somebody creates a media platform, do they not have responsibility as to how that platform is used? I believe that they do. Let's take the Rohingya genocide in Myanmar. Should FB be off the hook for expanding into a country where they had no language skills to enforce their own moderation rules? https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-46105934 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-46105934 > "quelled"? how? There are all sorts of moderation tools. For example, Community Notes on twitter.