3 ms·
I used fish for a while (and really enjoyed it, it's a great shell), but it's formatting is too inconsistent with bash for me. I found myself dropping back to z
by woleium 3y ago
I used fish for a while (and really enjoyed it, it's a great shell), but it's formatting is too inconsistent with bash for me. I found myself dropping back to zsh so often to write documentation or run a playbook that I switched back.
If you often share shell code with others it may be to big of a leap for you.
- csmattryder 3y agoIf you're running a script, you can use edc/bass to run it from a fish shell. Fisher is one of the first things I install after fish, then bass, z and a few other helper plugins. https://github.com/edc/bass https://github.com/edc/bass https://github.com/jorgebucaran/fisher https://github.com/jorgebucaran/fisher
- cedilla 3y agoI use fish since they relented and allowed to use && and || instead of ;or and ;and. Still, I always script with bash (or POSIX sh for certain things). I can't recommend that split enough. Also, I can't speak highly enough of shellcheck[1], it's a lifesaver especially when you target POSIX. 1: https://www.shellcheck.net/ https://www.shellcheck.net/
- keepamovin 3y agoI'm there with you on that.