4 ms·
They'll probably charge for h.265. This is why at least I want WebM to remain as an alternative and continue to be supported by browsers. It would at least keep
by nextparadigms 15y ago
They'll probably charge for h.265. This is why at least I want WebM to remain as an alternative and continue to be supported by browsers. It would at least keep MPEG-LA from ever charging for their codecs.
- protomyth 15y agoWell, since h.264 is in the good enough and has been built into a lot of hardware, I don't think we have much to worry about.