3 ms·
What you said is true, its something we would have to figure out on the way. What I have in mind is - 1. Topic specialized models which are frequently updated
by AMICABoard 3y ago
What you said is true, its something we would have to figure out on the way.
What I have in mind is -
1. Topic specialized models which are frequently updated maybe every month or two.
2. Fact Checking & Moderation specialized, models which moderate or do fact checking on other model's output.
Kind of a chicken and egg problem. But I believe on the way we will be able to minimize the effects of hallucinations through output validation (both neural and rule based).
- beardedwizard 3y agoPretty reasonable, I suggest you mention something along these lines to avoid further misconceptions
- AMICABoard 3y agoWill be updated with the next commit.
- beardedwizard 3y agoAn aside, any idea why this comment is being downvoted? Seems like a productive exchange.
- AMICABoard 3y agoNo idea. I have just upvoted your comment.
- beardedwizard 3y agoI figured it wasn't you :), anyway cheers buddy!
- AMICABoard 3y agoI have updated the description and added the requested clarification. To avoid trolls and invisible downvotes, you can always use github issues. You are welcome there. Thanks for the initial question. Ultimately it seems that there must always be a human in the loop somewhere.
- AMICABoard 3y agoPressing the up arrow beside the comments is upvote right? I hope this doesn't have some inverted logic.