3 ms·
I think you have this backwards, it was explained to me that the employer cannot refuse a consecutive vacation of up to 2 weeks, not that the employee has an ob
by morelisp 3y ago
I think you have this backwards, it was explained to me that the employer cannot refuse a consecutive vacation of up to 2 weeks, not that the employee has an obligation to take it as such.
- tommek4077 3y agoNo, the employee is also required to do that by law.
- morelisp 3y agoGot some further info? I can only find reports that this is common misinterpretation. https://www.rechtsindex.de/arbeitsrecht/490-jahresurlaub-muss-nicht-zusammenhaengend-genommen-werden https://www.rechtsindex.de/arbeitsrecht/490-jahresurlaub-mus...
- stop50 3y agoThe only case i encountered a rule like this was at a bank that is a customer of my employer. full-time employees must take 2 weeks of consecutive vacation and they are not permitted to access the systems in that time(for this period logins are disabled). But thats an company policy, that was introduced after an scandal.