3 ms·
Thank you for pointing that out. And I think that’s exactly what the article says: > This is the fundamental difference between the Mac (a platform that basica
by zuhsetaqi 3y ago
Thank you for pointing that out. And I think that’s exactly what the article says:
> This is the fundamental difference between the Mac (a platform that basically lets developers and users do anything they want) and the iPad (where if Apple doesn’t specifically allow it, it can’t be done).
The iPad has some really powerful use cases, but only the ones Apple made (like illustration work).
- hfgjdssaghj 3y agoI admit to a feeling of hopelessness discussing this well-worn topic on HN, but in my case I use my own iPad for reading books, annotating PDFs, taking notes, writing mails, watching videos, drawing, surfing the web, watching sport, listening to music, lightweight coding, using as an extra screen and probably other things I’ve forgotten. The kids have used it to shoot and edit stop-motion movies, and ‘compose’ music. As I said, at least one person I know keeps three people (including herself) in a home and fed, in one of the world’s most expensive cities. But apparently this is only what “Apple allow us to do”.