3 ms·
I don't understand the misleading title. What employees are paid was certainly a small part of the article, but how many employees you have seems to have been t
by binxbolling 15y ago
I don't understand the misleading title. What employees are paid was certainly a small part of the article, but how many employees you have seems to have been the major focus. So how does "Pay your employees more" capture the article's content at all?
- sophacles 15y agoWell, pedantically, employees is an aggregate term, and higher salary costs (either by higher individual wages or more individual wages) meets the conditions. Less pedantically: the focus was on more, better trained employees, and more experienced employees. In the later two situations, this generally translates to individuals being better paid -- experienced workers demand higher wages, as to better trained ones. Further, a large number of the faiure examples given were about firing the higher cost employees (experienced, trained ones, and full-time ones) in favor of cheaper ones, again implying that the per-employee wages were dropped as well.