> It's not merely semantics to point out: if a someone must do something, then it's not voluntary anymore. If you have the choice between: * letting the union

> It's not merely semantics to point out: if a someone must do something, then it's not voluntary anymore. If you have the choice between: * letting the union election go on unmolested, or * recognizing the union without an election. The latter would be voluntarily recognizing the union (instead of exercising your option to demand an election).