> My first thought upon reading this was that it seems rare for me to spend even 47 seconds looking at one screen on my computer without at least glancing at an

> My first thought upon reading this was that it seems rare for me to spend even 47 seconds looking at one screen on my computer without at least glancing at another. If you waste ~3k words to argue such an evident point as "note-taking tools can't make you smarter", of course you should be surprised if people would spend even 47 seconds skimming through your article.