3 ms·
Literally no one is advocating for this as is to be used as a substitute for currently proven treatment. It shouldn’t mean that we can’t try out different solut
by samtho 3y ago
Literally no one is advocating for this as is to be used as a substitute for currently proven treatment. It shouldn’t mean that we can’t try out different solutions, nor will the final hypothetical product derived from this likely even take the same form or possess the same chat interface.
We cannot let fear stall innovation because of someone might use it incorrectly.
- dylan604 3y agoSo says every person that has ever had a thing they made used in a way never intended. Deny users will do something you've never thought about at your own peril. Unfortunately, in cases like this your peril can have very negative consequences. This isn't a case of "manning up" and doing something scary. We're not astronauts going to the moon or any other situation where the decisions made will only affect you. This is a matter that when the product is misused or has a "glitch", it is not the maker that suffers. The fact that you will not even acknowledge this just proves maybe you are not the right person for this.