3 ms·
Unclear what exactly the plan is, other than an acknowledgment that ActivityPub exists.
by tedunangst 3y ago
Unclear what exactly the plan is, other than an acknowledgment that ActivityPub exists.
- 3np 3y agoSeems relatively clear to me after reading the "Why" and "How" sections and liked issues. They don't mention Gitea/Forgejo specifically but I assume the idea is to use compatible semantics. What are you missing?
- tedunangst 3y agoThe activity they plan to send for a merge request.
- WolfeReader 3y agoSeems pretty obvious: 1. Allow interaction between GitLab instances (instead of users needing different GitLab creds for each instance) 2. Emerging "GitLab network" grows to compete with, then replace, corporate-controlled Git hosts.