> They are valued at 1/3rd of what the company was purchased at That's not really a very useful metric, because Musk paid way too much for it in the first plac

> They are valued at 1/3rd of what the company was purchased at That's not really a very useful metric, because Musk paid way too much for it in the first place, and even without that it was probably overvalued to start with (IMHO). Besides, in the end a valuation, especially for a private company like Twitter/X, is not really all that useful and just a bunch of people going "well, I'd pay this much for it, I guess..." I don't know if Twitter is doing okay or not, but I do know this is not a good metric.