Absolutely right! The WSJ article could have done a much better job on this topic but instead ends with a rare true positive cancer detection success by a for-p

Absolutely right! The WSJ article could have done a much better job on this topic but instead ends with a rare true positive cancer detection success by a for-profit scanning company. That one rare success needs to be weighed against NN false positives. And a fraction of the true positives might well resolve on their own. What next—trolling assisted living communities?