> it's never impossible that any part of your body could be cancerous, so 'super unlikely to be cancerous but it's not impossible that it could be' is a terribl

> it's never impossible that any part of your body could be cancerous, so 'super unlikely to be cancerous but it's not impossible that it could be' is a terrible justification for taking action If you knew that you or your spouse had something that could be an issue but was unlikely to be - and it's nearly guaranteed that somewhere in your body right now you have stuff that would come back as "possibly a problem" in imaging - you'd be comfortable not taking action? I doubt that's how most people would response.