3 ms·
It's standard for BSD and MIT style licenses and similar to just require the copyright notice be retained in e.g. a LICENSE file or equivalent. A bunch of comm
by jaggederest 3y ago
It's standard for BSD and MIT style licenses and similar to just require the copyright notice be retained in e.g. a LICENSE file or equivalent.
A bunch of commercial software right now (cough I'm writing this on MacOS) uses BSD-licensed foundations.
- jen20 3y agoMPLv2 is file-based copyleft, and there are no restrictions on including it in a commercial work provided that changes to MPLv2-licensed files are accessible per the terms. Indeed it’s something of a spiritual successor to CDDL which was designed precisely for that purpose (although reliable sources also say it was designed to be GPL-incompatible, so that is literally a he-said/she-said case).
- erincandescent 3y agoThe CDDL is an MPLv1 derivative, so similarities should be unsurprising