> LLM's are not deterministic, They definitely can be, but it doesn't matter. > but I think you are making a giant assumption to the likes of since we can spe

> LLM's are not deterministic, They definitely can be, but it doesn't matter. > but I think you are making a giant assumption to the likes of since we can speed up matter to 1000km/h then IF we sped it up to light speed then ...[something]... This is an odd comparison. The point here is that a sequence prediction system can be as intelligent as the system it's predicting unless you invoke woo. That doesn't make llms intelligent but it means the argument that they just predict the next thing isn't enough to say the can't be.