4 ms·
This is in fact not “absurdly dangerous”. It may actually be safer than using a biological intelligence for the same purpose. Given that, and the shortage of bi
by srackey 3y ago
This is in fact not “absurdly dangerous”. It may actually be safer than using a biological intelligence for the same purpose. Given that, and the shortage of biological mental health workers, it seems reasonable that many many more would suffer negative outcomes were they not allowed to use this tech. As such, I’d argue that your comment is absurdly dangerous rhetoric, and your license to post on this web forum should be revoked.