3 ms·

..so? The point is that no-one was asking for a .zip TLD. It's common sense to not make one. "We should break backwards compatibility on the web so that Google

..so? The point is that no-one was asking for a .zip TLD. It's common sense to not make one. "We should break backwards compatibility on the web so that Google can sell a TLD" is not a defensive viewpoint.

lockhouse 3y ago
That vulnerability exists even without .zip domain names, it just makes it a little easier to pull off.