> - can you kettle a peaceful --yet fully armed-- protest? what are the benefits? risks? If you wish people to accept or even join your movement, violence seem

> - can you kettle a peaceful --yet fully armed-- protest? what are the benefits? risks? If you wish people to accept or even join your movement, violence seems to be counter-productive: > For more than a century, from 1900 to 2006, campaigns of nonviolent resistance were more than twice as effective as their violent counterparts in achieving their stated goals. By attracting impressive support from citizens, whose activism takes the form of protests, boycotts, civil disobedience, and other forms of nonviolent noncooperation, these efforts help separate regimes from their main sources of power and produce remarkable results, even in Iran, Burma, the Philippines, and the Palestinian Territories. * https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/10056014-why-civil-resistance-works https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/10056014-why-civil-resis...