Yeah, sort of cringe to see that this is rated "Good Article" if it's that bad, factually. But Good (and Featured) Article ratings often have little to do with

Yeah, sort of cringe to see that this is rated "Good Article" if it's that bad, factually. But Good (and Featured) Article ratings often have little to do with the factual content of the article. The reviewer checks a lot of cosmetic and stylistic features, and they largely check that every claim is cited to a source that can be considered generally reliable. They're not going to really check the actual quality, veracity, or reputation of those sources in regards to the specific topic. GA reviews can have such awful blind spots. I've seen many, many things slip by the reviewer when they were just eager to put another green dot on their profile.