4 ms·
Why would they use SipHash at all? That’s a significantly slower hash algo than, say, wyhash, and any additional DOS protection SipHash might have (assuming it
by meisel 3y ago
Why would they use SipHash at all? That’s a significantly slower hash algo than, say, wyhash, and any additional DOS protection SipHash might have (assuming it does) seems irrelevant for this use case
- loeg 3y agoRight? Jump straight to one of the modern, fast, non-cryptographic hashes.