9 ms·
With the recent legislation that every Polish village has to be connected to water and sewage even if the homeowner wanted to remain off-grid, I would expect no
by OfSanguineFire 3y ago
With the recent legislation that every Polish village has to be connected to water and sewage even if the homeowner wanted to remain off-grid, I would expect not expect well-digging to remain popular.
- jcarrano 3y agoIt still makes sense to have a well because it is a waste to water the lawn with drinking water.
- OfSanguineFire 3y agoIt is not as common to water one’s lawn in Poland. It’s not like the country doesn’t get enough rain, and most villagers don’t feel the need to show off perfect lawns to their neighbors as e.g. in the USA.
- quickthrower2 3y agoDon’t water the lawn (or fertilise or roundup etc.) in Australia: for some reason it stays green without it: buffalo grass is as tough as nails! Sometimes it goes yellow but it always comes back!
- moooo99 3y agoLawns in the US consume as many resources as they do because the typical lawn you see isn't a species native to the US, instead it was imported from Europe. With the soil being different etc., it is not surprising lawns, especially when they're as big as in the US, require so many resources.
- bluGill 3y agoMany lawns in the US do use grass native to that part of the US. Not all, but many. However grass goes dormant when it doesn't rain for a couple weeks and people don't like that brown look so they water even though the grass (either native or imported) doesn't need it. Likewise people don't like flowers and other weeds and so they apply a lot of chemicals to the lawn - but the grass doesn't need them. TL;DR: lawns in the US do not need any resources. It is "perfect lawns" that need a lot of resources.
- peterleiser 3y agoWhat is the species that is not native?
- eesmith 3y agoKentucky Bluegrass - Poa pratensis - is a common lawn grass which despite its name is not originally from North America. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poa_pratensis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poa_pratensis Another is Perennial Ryegrass - Lolium perenne - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lolium_perenne https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lolium_perenne . A third is the common bent - Agrostis capillaris - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agrostis_capillaris https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agrostis_capillaris .
- quickthrower2 3y agoWow I am surprised monsanto etc. hasn’t come up with and patented a seed to work well on US soil (pun intended)
- lost_tourist 3y agoI went with a native grass and my watering is down to 1/4 what it was before that. the grass does go dormant and turn brown in the summer/colder winters though, so it's not as pretty but it is what it is, and HOA allows "xeroscaping"
- moooo99 3y agoimho that is the only sane way. The water consumption for keeping a lawn green in during the now all so common heatwaves is absurd and really not worth it considering the lawn will be fine once it starts raining again
- yarpen_z 3y agoWe don't really have suburbs like the one in the US. Having a perfect lawn that requires constant watering and meticulous care is not common.
- boppo1 3y agoWhat is the landscaping around single family homes like then? Or do you just have urban & rural without an in-between?
- OfSanguineFire 3y agoGoogle Street View will let you look at plenty of Polish homes.
- wizzwizz4 3y agoTrees, hedges, native grasses and shrubs: the kinds of plant you'd probably consider "weeds" in US suburbia. Within cities, there's https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terraced_house https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terraced_house, and there are villages in amongst the fields and forests of rural areas. Places like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gaeltacht_Park,_Whitehall._Dublin,_Ireland_-_geograph.org.uk_-_332084.jpg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gaeltacht_Park,_Whitehall... are the closest I've really seen to US suburbia, and it's always been within walking distance of a food shop.
- cogman10 3y agoI'm the EU, most homes are terraced. There may be a back and front yard, but they will be tiny compared to a US home. Single family homes are both expensive and uncommon as land is generally more of a premium.
- seszett 3y agoEven in Belgium, one of the highest density countries in the EU, most existing and newly built houses are semi-detached, with about twice as much semi-detached + detached houses as there are terraced houses. In France, terraced homes are rather uncommon outside the North close to Belgium, and old city centers. In fact, I don't even know if we have a name for detached houses, as far as I know they're just called "a house" while a terraced house is a "city house". So I don't have the numbers for all of the EU but I don't think most homes are actually terraced homes in the EU. And people do have grass lawns, but only where grass actually grows without too much care needed. Where I come from on the coast grass doesn't grow well on the sandy ground and lawns are uncommon, but a few kilometres inland if you don't do anything you get a mostly-grass lawn, with a lot of clover, daisies and often orchids growing in it.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- moooo99 3y ago> It still makes sense to have a well because it is a waste to water the lawn with drinking water. Watering the lawn is just a waste of water, period. Ground water is commonly used as the primary source of drinking water, so even if the water is being extracted from a well, it is pretty much drinking water.
- lost_tourist 3y agoThis is the next environmental movement i'd love to see, the end of lawns and acceptance of native landscapes all over the world, but especially the western world.
- OfSanguineFire 3y agoThis very much depends on the place. There are plenty of areas of Europe where groundwater at ordinary well depth is no longer potable and the community relies on a reservoir with a different source. So, if your property has an old well, all it is good for is watering a lawn or orchard, washing your car or bicycle, etc.
- eric-hu 3y agoI’m curious: if the water isn’t considered potable, would you want to be watering plants with it? Is the contamination more often bacterial than chemical?
- OfSanguineFire 3y agoPeople all over the world water plants with water that is not potable itself due to bacterial or viral contamination. This is where the old traveler’s adage “Boil it, cook it, peel it, or forget it” comes from. If the groundwater is not potable because of e.g. arsenic or pesticide contamination, I think that homeowners are usually aware of that and therefore are more likely to use the water only for washing purposes.
- eric-hu 3y ago
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- fakedang 3y agoI think we'll see a similar scenario as what happened in many rural and semi-urban areas of India. Most folks use well water for their daily use, but still maintain an urban/central water connection in case of emergencies (especially as droughts are becoming more of a reality worldwide). Well digging is still going strong - actually stronger, since people are now digging deeper wells as the water table is shrinking.
- momirlan 3y agoyou also have to consider the price to pay for metered municipal water. i would still prefer free water from my own dug well.
- OfSanguineFire 3y agoI did consider that price: it is negligible in Poland. The now-obligatory water and sewage connection in all villages brings service fees that people sometimes grumble about, but water itself doesn’t cost very much.
- badtension 3y agoYou could bypass that with a domestic wastewater treatment plant.
- OfSanguineFire 3y agoThat does not appear to be the case. A friend of mine spent a considerable amount of money a few years ago to build a wastewater treatment system on his property. Then the gmina told him that, under new legislation, he would still have to connect his property to the common sewage system. This is something that he and many of his neighbours were reluctant to do, because it brings new monthly service charges. He tried to argue his case and managed to stall for several months, but eventually he was forced to do so lest he be fined. I have heard villagers in Spain and Italy complaining about the same thing, so I assumed there was a new loi communitaire.
- Animatronio 3y agoA sewage system doesn't work well without periodic flushes. Having too few houses connected to it means it is at risk of drying and clogging. Most probably when it was designed they took into account the number of houses is was supposed to collect waste water from. Anything less then that number would be risky for the whole system.
- badtension 3y agoThat's very concerning, I did a little query yesterday and haven't found any law changes that might have been introduced recently. https://sip.lex.pl/akty-prawne/dzu-dziennik-ustaw/utrzymanie-czystosci-i-porzadku-w-gminach-16797931/roz-3 https://sip.lex.pl/akty-prawne/dzu-dziennik-ustaw/utrzymanie... Not trying to ignore your point, I am aware gmina might try and force their own solutions without respect to the more general law (there's been cases resolved in favor of the common people in the past). If you have any more details why you absolutely have to connect to the municipal sewage system please let me know.