3 ms·
It seems like professor Higashiyama is really conducting research in perception, not so much psychology, as it is understood popularly. He also seems skeptical
by YeGoblynQueenne 3y ago
It seems like professor Higashiyama is really conducting research in perception, not so much psychology, as it is understood popularly. He also seems skeptical of what is commonly er perceived as psychological research- and I share his skepticism. FTA:
>> Many studies place importance on overt, conscious actions like seeing and listening. And some psychologists conclude that people are of one personality type or another based on questionnaires that lack evidence, and which are therefore indistinguishable from fortune-telling.
>> “So, people have biases in their understanding,” explains Higashiyama. “The same importance as placed on sight and hearing has to be placed on physical information as well, and conclusions must be based on evidence. Researchers need to be aware of the fact that the field of psychology runs the risk of changing people’s lives.”
- stdbrouw 3y agoScepticism is great, but that's perhaps not how I would describe praising a quote from an Ig Nobel prize winner that discards the entire field of personality psychology just because it happens to align with what you already believe.
- YeGoblynQueenne 3y agoTo clarify, I'm skeptical of the same thing he expresses skepticism about, not of his skepticism.
- red_trumpet 3y agoThe perception article in Wikipedia[1] is part of the psychology series. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perception https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perception
- user_named 3y agoThat's a very verbose akshually you have there
- YeGoblynQueenne 3y agoa wat