>If being unable to support themselves is the concern, why not make that the actual requirement to stay... That's a good idea. That's how it is here in Japan:

>If being unable to support themselves is the concern, why not make that the actual requirement to stay... That's a good idea. That's how it is here in Japan: knowing the language is good, and gets you some points on your visa, but it's not a requirement. If you have a high-paying job offer from a sponsoring company, and a good educational and professional background (or other factors, like if you're in academia), then that's good too. They figure you'll learn the language on your own in that case. If you have no education and no way to support yourself, and can't communicate with anyone, why would they want you? Unless it's to exploit you. I don't think we should be promoting exploitation. >Versus of an indirect and error-prone language requirement set by what are probably a bunch of old white monolingual men in Washington, DC? US doesn't have a language requirement. We're talking about Canada, so you mean a bunch of white bilingual (English/French) people in Ottawa.