3 ms·
Another bullshit article. Thanks to articles like this companies waste resources on "ai safety" which practically means the model refuses basic requests because
by zb3 3y ago
Another bullshit article. Thanks to articles like this companies waste resources on "ai safety" which practically means the model refuses basic requests because "oh it might offend someone and some journalist might smear our company".
Meanwhile open-source models are already there and are be here to stay. So instead of trying to uphold the unsustainable status-quo that images are trustworthy, it's time to realize they aren't.
- archerx 3y agoThis is probably the reason I will stop paying for the stability API and just host my own instance of Stable Diffusion. I’m not trying to generate porn or sexy images, my problem is the massive amount of false positives! My project revolves around making video to video animations with Stable diffusion but when 10 images of your 100 frame sequence is blurred out (for safety) it ruins the entire thing, you’ve lost both time and money. I complained to Stability and they were kind enough to refund me some credits. The funny thing is an image of someone winking at the camera will trigger it but a bunch of unsolicited nipples makes it through with out any issues. It’s too bad because I want to support Stability but these false positives will force me to stop paying them directly for the API.