> It goes on to list the tech giant's conditions for continued support of the bill. Those conditions include that the bill not feature a requirement for manufac

> It goes on to list the tech giant's conditions for continued support of the bill. Those conditions include that the bill not feature a requirement for manufacturers to enable repair providers to disable device security features. The biggest tool that Apple has against right-to-repair is billed as a security feature - That they register the components and disable features when they're replaced. There's legitimate use for this as a security feature, as it prevents many evil-maid attacks, where the attacker installs a non-genuine camera and slurps data that way. And that's probably what Apple had figured out they can rely on. They pretend that their lock-in is a security measure, serialize all of the replaceable components, and refuse to give the tools to allow replacing the serial numbers.